Location: Home > Papers
  Papers
First Author: HONG Bing
Abstract:

Ubiquitous detection of pharmaceuticals in the aquatic environment around the world raises a great public concern. Aquatic residuals of pharmaceuticals have been assumed to relate to land use patterns and various human activities within a catchment or watershed. This study generated a gradient of human activity in the Jiulong River watershed, southeastern China by urban land use percentage in 20 research subwatersheds. Thirty-three compounds from three-category pharmaceuticals [26 compounds of 5 antibiotic groups, 6 compounds of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and 1 compound of respiratory system drugs (RSDs)] were quantified in stream water before the research subwatershed confluences with two sampling events in dry and wet seasons. In total, 27 out of the 33 pharmaceutical compounds of interest were found in stream waters. Seasonality of instream pharmaceuticals was observed, with less compounds and lower concentrations in the wet season sampling event than in the dry season one. Urban land use in the research subwatershed was identified as the main factor influencing in stream pharmaceutical concentrations and composition regardless of season. Rural land uses contributed a mixture of human and veterinary pharmaceuticals possibly from agricultural application of manure and sewage sludge and aquaculture in the research subwatersheds. Erythromycin in both sampling events showed medium to high risks to aquatic organisms. Results of this study suggest that urban pharmaceutical management, such as a strict prescription regulations and high-efficient removal of pharmaceuticals in wastewater treatment, is critical in reducing aquatic pharmaceutical loads.

Locations of the Jiulong River watershed in southeastern China with 3 Class I subwatersheds with land use patterns. The 15 research subwatersheds in the North Stream (labeled as “North”, the Class I subwatershed) were labeled as “N-01” to “N-15” with an increasing urban land use percentage in the subwatershed by 2014, ranging from 0.1% to 26.3% as Table S1 in Supplementary Information. There were 3 research subwatersheds (W-01, W-02, and W-03) in the West Stream (labeled as “West”, the Class I subwatershed) and 2 research subwatersheds (S-01 and S-02) sampled in the South Stream (labeled as “South”, the Class I subwatershed). Land use composition of each research subwatershed and Class I subwatershed referred to Table S1.

Contact the author: YU Shen
Page Number: 448-458
Issue:
Subject:
Impact Factor:
Authors units:
PubYear: SEP 2018
Volume: 634
Publication Name: SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
The full text link: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.392
ISSN:
Appendix: